In the Welcome Article for this blogsite I raised the remarkable phenomenon of how the gospel spread so quickly and pervasively when it burst onto Greco-Rome of classical times – even though it was met with ferocious and bloody opposition from that same world. So what fueled such a forceful advance? Several reasons stand out, but the one that I want to focus on for the next while has to do with what the people of that era saw in the Bible of their day. But to better appreciate what they saw, we need to re-discover their Bible since it has become a mostly forgotten book in our day. So with this endgoal in mind, I introduce the Bible of that era – the Septuagint. But first let’s back up abit in history.
Historical Background to the Septuagint
When Alexander the Great conquered the then known world he brought the Greek language, culture and philosophy to the civilizations of the Mediterranean, the Middle East, and Asia. When he died in 323 BC at the age of 32 he left behind a world that almost universally adopted the Greek language, thought and culture (known as Hellenism), thus unifying the world so that ideas and writings could be exchanged by all in one universal language – Greek. And the Roman Empire which succeeded his short-lived conquests continued to use, and thus increase the influence of, Greek.
Greek was the principal language of the classical world from about 300 BC – 300 AD, and thus a translation of the Hebrew Old Testament into Greek was made around 200 B.C. by a group of Jewish rabbis in Alexandria (a city in Egypt present till today and founded by Alexander the Great). Known as the Septuagint (or LXX), it was widely used in the Greco-Roman world and was of critical importance in the development of the Gospel for several reasons.
Impact of the Septuagint
First of all, the Septuagint translation was made because in that Hellenistic world the Jewish people were slowly losing their grasp of Hebrew and many were becoming primarily Greek-speakers and the LXX thus allowed them to continue reading their scriptures in their new language. But it also allowed the writings of the Old Testament to be read and assessed by basically all Gentiles (non-Jews). And in the spirit of that age in which philosophy, history and religion of various cultures were read, for the first time many non-Jews were exposed to the writings of the ancient Hebrew prophets.
Septuagint impact on New Testament times
We see the impact of this in the New Testament historical accounts. John 12:20 tells us that Greeks (i.e. non-Jews) were worshiping at a Jewish feast in Jerusalem and asked to meet with Jesus. Why are Greeks ‘worshiping’ at a Jewish festival in Jerusalem? It is the influence of the Septuagint. The book of Acts records the travels of the apostles subsequent to the ministry of Jesus and it notes how they would come upon (and even look for) non-Jewish converts to Judaism. Why are there non-Jewish converts to Judaism dotted around the Greco-Roman world in the period 30-60 AD (the period covered by Acts)? Again, the influence of the Septuagint having been read, heard, and brought to the attention of non-Jews for more than two hundred years had fostered this development.
And what did these people ‘see’ in the Septuagint? For starters they saw ‘Christ’ in the pages of the Old Testament because the word was used directly in it.
Septuagint in Modern Textual Criticism and Translation
The Septuagint is also significant in textual criticism. We noted in the 2nd video of Session 3 (the one dealing with Old Testament textual reliability) that we basically have two families of Hebrew manuscripts with which we access the Hebrew Old Testament and translate it into a modern language. The more traditional stream is the Masoretic family of manuscripts, which has extant manuscripts dating from about 900 AD. This is the traditional source for the Old Testament in today’s Bible. I noted that the second stream, the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) were only recently discovered in 1948 and are dated back to about 200 BC. Thus in the DSS we have a much older family of manuscripts than the Masoretic text. And I noted that these two families of texts are basically identical – showing how well preserved the Hebrew Old Testament is.
The Septuagint gives us a third stream of text to access the Old Testament. Since the Septuagint was translated from the Hebrew around 200 BC we can see (if in a sense we reverse translate) what these translators had in their Hebrew manuscripts that they translated from. The most widely accepted view today is that the Septuagint provides an accurate record of an early Hebrew text, now lost, that had some variance from the ancestors of the Masoretic text. And so it is used as a supplemental source in translation today. This is why you can see some footnotes in modern translations of the Old Testament where our modern translators tell us what the Septuagint says in some particular passage. In other words, translation scholars use the Septuagint to this day to help them translate some of the more difficult passages of the Old Testament. Greek is very well understood and in some passages where the Hebrew is obscure translators can see how the Septuagint translators understood these obscure passages. As an example, when the New International Version translates the last phrase of Job 7:20 to ‘Have I become a burden to you?’ they are helped by the Septuagint. How do I know this? The footnotes indicate it. The overall contribution then of the Septuagint to the Old Testament is that it provides another manuscript stream supporting the reliability of the Old Testament as well as providing insight for some more obscure passages.
Septuagint in the Orthodox
But even more than a supplement to translate the Old Testament, followers of the Gospel in Eastern Orthodox traditions (Greek, Coptic etc.) to this day use the Septuagint over the Masoretic text (either in reading from the LXX directly or in translating primarily from the LXX rather than the Hebrew text). It is their preferred manuscript family.
Extant Septuagint Manuscripts
Of course, just like we do not have the originals of the Hebrew Old Testament, neither do we have the originals of the Septuagint (ie the scrolls that the original translators back in 200 BC developed). We have manuscript copies of these. The oldest extant manuscripts of the LXX include fragments of Leviticus and Deuteronomy dated to 2nd century BC (Rahlfs nos. 801, 819, and 957), and 1st century BC fragments of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and the Minor Prophets (Rahlfs nos. 802, 803, 805, 848, 942, and 943). Complete manuscripts of the LXX are found in the Codex Vaticanus (325 AD) and the Codex Sinaiticus (350 AD). (See Session Three if you need a primer on what these Codices are.)
Summary of Old Testament development with Septuagint
We can summarize what we have covered of the Old Testament text using a timeline shown in the figure below. The individual books of the Old Testament were written down in Hebrew over more than a thousand year period . They were translated into the Septuagint (LXX) around 200 BC so from then on there was a Greek as well as a Hebrew text stream. The Codices Vaticanus and Sinaiticus (from early-mid 300’s AD) are extant copies of the LXX. The Hebrew text was preserved by the Masoretes, from whom we have extant manuscripts dating approximately 900 AD. The Dead Sea Scrolls was another Hebrew textual family dating to around 200-100 BC that was essentially identical to the Masoretic text. Translations into English today primarily use the Hebrew Masoretic and Dead Sea Scrolls, but the LXX is also used to inform translators on meaning and choice of words.
But these are not the primary reasons why the Septuagint ‘has changed human history’ We consider that in our next post.
Thank you so much..it helped me a lot.
This is an insightful article. However, there is one glaring oversight: I wonder why the author makes no mention of the Egyptian Text, whose first modern discovery was in Egypt, and it was also found with the DSS? It is the text used as the Hebrew foundation for the LXX and it does differ in places to the Masoretic Text (MT). It is the Hebrew BIble that Jesus quoted from, not the MT.